From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] rename dirlink to gitlink. Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:19:05 -0700 Message-ID: <7vd50t9y92.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070521200828.GC5412@admingilde.org> <7vodkdbvmk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070522055939.GG5412@admingilde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Torgil Svensson , git@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Waitz X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 22 08:19:26 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HqNiM-0003mI-3O for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 08:19:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755879AbXEVGTQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 02:19:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756114AbXEVGTP (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 02:19:15 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44]:59942 "EHLO fed1rmmtao102.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755879AbXEVGTP (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 02:19:15 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070522061914.EYWH2758.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Tue, 22 May 2007 02:19:14 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 26KD1X00a1kojtg0000000; Tue, 22 May 2007 02:19:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070522055939.GG5412@admingilde.org> (Martin Waitz's message of "Tue, 22 May 2007 07:59:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Martin Waitz writes: > hoi :) > > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 04:32:51PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> As an internal symbol, S_IFDIRLNK makes _much_ more sense than >> S_IFGITLINK, exactly because it is a mixture of S_IFDIR and >> S_IFLNK. > > But then we also should be consequent and rename the entire > low-level plumbing to dirlink. I don't see a reason to keep > both. Ok. Let's do that then before it is too late.