From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>, Chris Lee <clee@kde.org>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git-index-pack really does suck..
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:31:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vd52lum2f.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704031427050.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org> (Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:28:22 -0700 (PDT)")
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> Side note: with "alternates" files, you might well *always* have the
> objects. If you do
>
> git clone -l -s ...
>
> to create various branches, and then pull between them, you'll actually
> end up in the situation that you'll always find the objects and get back
> to the really expensive case..
Ah, that's true. If you "git clone -l -s A B", create new
objects in A and pull from B, the transfer would not exclude
new objects as they are not visible from B's refs.
In that scenario, the keep-pack behaviour is already worse than
the unpack-objects behaviour. The former creates a packfile
that duplicates objects that are in A while the latter, although
expensive, ends up doing nothing.
I wonder if we can have a backdoor to avoid any object transfer
in such a case to begin with...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-03 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-03 15:15 git-index-pack really does suck Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <Pi ne.LNX.4.64.0704031413200.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.0.98. 0704031836350.28181@xanadu.home>
[not found] ` <db 69205d0704031227q1009eabfhdd82aa3636f25bb6@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.07 04031304420.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704031322490.67 30@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-03 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 16:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 16:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 19:27 ` Chris Lee
2007-04-03 19:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 19:54 ` Chris Lee
2007-04-03 20:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 20:32 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 20:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-03 21:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 21:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 22:49 ` Chris Lee
2007-04-03 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 20:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 21:03 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 21:17 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 21:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 21:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 22:31 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2007-04-03 22:38 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 22:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-05 10:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] git-fetch--tool pick-rref Junio C Hamano
2007-04-05 10:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] git-fetch: use fetch--tool pick-rref to avoid local fetch from alternate Junio C Hamano
2007-04-05 16:15 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-05 21:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-03 21:34 ` git-index-pack really does suck Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 21:37 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 21:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-03 21:53 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 22:10 ` Jeff King
2007-04-03 22:40 ` Dana How
2007-04-03 22:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 22:31 ` David Lang
2007-04-03 23:00 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 21:21 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 21:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 21:11 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 21:24 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <alpine.LF D.0.98.0704031735470.28181@xanadu.home>
2007-04-03 21:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 22:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-03 22:11 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 22:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 22:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 22:36 ` David Lang
2007-04-04 9:51 ` Alex Riesen
[not found] ` <P ine.LNX.4.63.0704061455380.24050@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
2007-04-06 21:56 ` David Lang
2007-04-06 22:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-06 22:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-06 22:22 ` David Lang
2007-04-06 22:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-06 22:28 ` David Lang
2007-04-03 23:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-03 20:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vd52lum2f.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=clee@kde.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).