From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Fix some "printf format" warnings. Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:41:52 -0700 Message-ID: <7vd53b5r5r.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <45E9BE46.1020801@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> <7v4pp29eok.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <45EAFD21.6010002@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> <45F55DC5.8060702@fs.ei.tum.de> <7vfy8as129.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <45F87DC7.7020503@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Simon 'corecode' Schubert , GIT Mailing-list To: Ramsay Jones X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 15 00:42:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HRd6f-0005sB-6w for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:42:09 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964838AbXCNXly (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:41:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964840AbXCNXly (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:41:54 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.241.42]:47939 "EHLO fed1rmmtao104.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964838AbXCNXlx (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:41:53 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070314234152.PMN1226.fed1rmmtao104.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:41:52 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id anhs1W00m1kojtg0000000; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:41:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <45F87DC7.7020503@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> (Ramsay Jones's message of "Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:57:11 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ramsay Jones writes: >>> printf("%s%06"PRIo32" %s %d\t", tag, ntohl(ce->ce_mode), ...) >>> >>> that's the correct and allegedly portable way I guess. I do not think this is really worth it. printf("%s%06o %s %d\t", tag, (unsigned) ntohl(ce->ce_mode), ... is perfectly readable for even old timers about git, as long as they know traditional C and what ntohl() is. And ce->ce_mode even fits in 16-bit, so while we are _not_ supporting platforms whose unsigned int is 16-bit, the above cast is not losing any useful precision either. > (the symbols being: uint32_t, uint64_t, uint16_t, uintmax_t) I think we would want these exact-sized integer types, so if they are missing the platform ports may want to supply their own substitute.