From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] config: read system-wide defaults from /etc/gitconfig Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:12:16 -0800 Message-ID: <7vd54cpq0v.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200702140909.28369.andyparkins@gmail.com> <7vfy98snus.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vlkj0pqp5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Peter Baumann , Andy Parkins , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 14 19:12:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HHOc8-0005zy-J6 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:12:20 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932417AbXBNSMR (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:12:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932421AbXBNSMR (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:12:17 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:46190 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932417AbXBNSMR (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:12:17 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070214181217.HGRU21177.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:12:17 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id PWCG1W00E1kojtg0000000; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:12:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:02:01 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Hi, > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Johannes Schindelin writes: >> >> > Well, I don't use it myself (other than testing that the patch does what >> > it says). Let the list decide? >> >> I am slightly worried about stupid distros screwing people over >> by shipping with a bad default config in /etc, which would make >> diagnosing their problems harder without knowing what they have >> there. But other than that I do not have a problem with it. > > They can do that already by shipping with a bad default /etc/skel/ > directory. That's slightly different. I can ask "Do you have anything special in your $HOME/.gitconfig?" Now I have to ask two questions (and I would not know if a particular distro compiled git to use /etc/git/default.config or /etc/gitconfig or whatever).