From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What's in git.git (stable) Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:06:31 -0800 Message-ID: <7vd54yex14.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vps90nbbv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <17852.64183.371967.470683@lisa.zopyra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Bill Lear X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 28 21:06:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HBGIQ-00054W-BS for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:06:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932805AbXA1UGd (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:06:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932806AbXA1UGd (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:06:33 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:44628 "EHLO fed1rmmtao03.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932805AbXA1UGc (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:06:32 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070128200632.LOPG29122.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:06:32 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id Gk5Z1W00T1kojtg0000000; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:05:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <17852.64183.371967.470683@lisa.zopyra.com> (Bill Lear's message of "Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:34:15 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Bill Lear writes: > On Saturday, January 27, 2007 at 00:05:56 (-0800) Junio C Hamano writes: >>I am hoping that we can declare -rc3 and go into a deep freeze >>after merging Shawn's "describe with accumulated commits since" >>and Nico's "reflog on HEAD", perhaps by end of the month. > > Was there any final decision on allowing pushes through git-daemon? Not really. I personally think it is Ok as long as the default stays disabled as Linus posted.