From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fetching packs and storing them as packs
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:09:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vd58daxoh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061028034206.GA14044@spearce.org> (Shawn Pearce's message of "Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:42:06 -0400")
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
> So a reader-writer lock is preferred over
> a non-locking solution such as I posted in
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/30288 ?
If you mean these two in your message to be "solution":
So the receive-pack process becomes:
a. Create temporary pack file in $GIT_DIR/objects/pack_XXXXX.
b. Create temporary index file in $GIT_DIR/objects/index_XXXXX.
c. Write pack and index.
d. Move pack to $GIT_DIR/objects/pack/...
e. Move index to $GIT_DIR/objects/pack...
f. Update refs.
g. Arrange for new pack and index to be considered active.
And the repack -a -d process becomes:
1. List all active packs and store in memory.
2. Repack only loose objects and objects contained in active packs.
3. Move new pack and idx into $GIT_DIR/objects/pack/...
4. Arrange for new pack and idx to be considered active.
5. Delete active packs found by step #1.
I am not so sure how it solves anything at all.
The race is about this sequence:
- git-receive-pack is spawned from remove git-send-pack;
it lets "index-pack --stdin --fatten" to keep the pack.
- index-pack does its magic and moves the pack and idx
to their final location;
- "repack -a -d" is started by somebody else; it first
remembers all the existing packs; it does the usual
repacking-into-one.
- git-receive-pack that invoked the index-pack waits for
index-pack to finish, and then updates the refs;
- "repack -a -d" is done repacking; removes the packs
that existed when it checked earlier.
Now, I am not sure what your plan to "arrange for new pack and
idx to be considered active" is. Care to explain?
There is a tricky constraints imposed on us by (arguably broken)
commit walkers in that it relies on the (arguably broken)
sha1_file.c:sha1_pack_name() interface, so naming historical
ones $GIT_OBJECT_DIR/pack/hist-X{40}.pack would not work; we
would need to fix commit walkers for that first.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-28 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-26 3:44 fetching packs and storing them as packs Nicolas Pitre
2006-10-26 14:45 ` Eran Tromer
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610261105200.12418@xanadu.home>
2006-10-26 22:09 ` Eran Tromer
2006-10-27 0:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-10-27 1:42 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-27 2:38 ` Sean
2006-10-27 6:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-10-27 17:23 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-10-27 2:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-10-27 2:42 ` Eran Tromer
2006-10-27 3:00 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-27 3:13 ` Sean
2006-10-27 3:20 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-10-27 3:27 ` Sean
2006-10-27 4:03 ` Eran Tromer
2006-10-27 4:42 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-27 7:42 ` Alex Riesen
2006-10-27 7:52 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-27 8:08 ` Alex Riesen
2006-10-27 8:13 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-27 14:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-10-27 14:38 ` Petr Baudis
2006-10-27 14:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-10-27 15:03 ` Petr Baudis
2006-10-27 16:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-10-27 16:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-10-27 18:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-10-27 20:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-27 21:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-10-28 3:42 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-28 4:09 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2006-10-28 4:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-28 5:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-10-28 7:21 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-28 8:40 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-28 19:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-10-29 3:50 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-29 4:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-10-29 4:38 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-29 5:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-10-29 5:21 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-28 17:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-28 18:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-10-28 22:31 ` Eran Tromer
2006-10-29 3:38 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-29 3:48 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-10-29 3:52 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-29 7:47 ` [PATCH] send-pack --keep: do not explode into loose objects on the receiving end Junio C Hamano
2006-10-29 7:56 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-29 8:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-10-30 1:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vd58daxoh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).