From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: gitweb wishlist Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 17:30:21 -0700 Message-ID: <7vd5rgtaea.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <428E745C.30304@zytor.com> <4292A08A.5050108@cobite.com> <20050524161745.GA9537@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20050524184612.GA23637@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20050525003917.40700d19.froese@gmx.de> <7vk6lotbil.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Edgar Toernig , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 25 02:29:19 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dajll-0003XA-K9 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 02:29:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262178AbVEYAae (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 20:30:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262197AbVEYAae (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 20:30:34 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29]:14792 "EHLO fed1rmmtao10.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262178AbVEYAaZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 20:30:25 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.60.172]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050525003021.TEMY20235.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:30:21 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 24 May 2005 17:17:37 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "LT" == Linus Torvalds writes: LT> The sad part is that I don't even have an excuse like "I use LT> perl all the time". No, shell is my _forte_ when it comes to LT> scripting. You are allowed to suck at scripting when you are so good at C ;-). By the by, are you still having problem with "whatchanged -s"? I see a few of my patches still not in your tree, and I do not care too much about the last one (rename/copy similarity estimator update) after you made it clear that -M and -C are of lower priority, I would like to know if the "diff-tree -s" fix I sent you was missing the point, and if so how. Also the test scripts to verify your fix to the "checkout-cache --prefix pointing at some directory via symlink" along with your fix is something I feel ready to go. Hoping it would be easy to look for a message by message-ID, here they are. The first one is the proposed "diff-tree -s" fix. Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Diff overhaul, adding the other half... Message-ID: <7vr7fxuh8b.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Subject: Squelch compiler warning Message-ID: <7vis18v4ea.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Subject: [PATCH] Allow symlinks in the leading path in checkout-cache --prefix= Message-ID: <7vacmlvwfk.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Subject: [PATCH] Update rename/copy similarity estimator. Message-ID: <7vbr70v3tf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>