From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 03/26] pkt-line: Make packet_read_line easier to debug
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:35:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7veioklloq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091030175741.GC18583@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri\, 30 Oct 2009 13\:57\:41 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:58:29PM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
>
>> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> > > The NUL assignment isn't about safe_read(), its about making the
>> > > block of 4 bytes read a proper C-style string so we can safely pass
>> > > it down into the snprintf that is within die().
>> >
>> > I knew and understood all of what you just said. static linelen[] is not
>> > about stack allocation. It's about letting the compiler initialize it to
>> > five NULs so that you do not have to assign NUL to its fifth place before
>> > you die. This removes one added line from your patch.
>>
>> Thanks, I get it now. Patch amended.
>
> I am just a bystander, so maybe my opinion is not worth anything, but
> personally I think you are obfuscating the code to save a single line.
Well, the comment was not a serious "you should do it this way" to begin
with. An extra assignment in the error path is not a big deal.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-30 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-29 0:00 [RFC PATCH v4 00/26] Return of smart HTTP Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/26] http-push: fix check condition on http.c::finish_http_pack_request() Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/26] pkt-line: Add strbuf based functions Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/26] pkt-line: Make packet_read_line easier to debug Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 3:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-29 15:11 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 20:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-29 21:58 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-30 17:57 ` Jeff King
2009-10-30 19:12 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-30 19:30 ` Jeff King
2009-10-30 19:31 ` David Brown
2009-10-30 19:35 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/26] fetch-pack: Use a strbuf to compose the want list Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/26] Move "get_ack()" back to fetch-pack Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 3:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-29 15:08 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/26] Add multi_ack_detailed capability to fetch-pack/upload-pack Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 5:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-29 16:17 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/26] remote-curl: Refactor walker initialization Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/26] fetch: Allow transport -v -v -v to set verbosity to 3 Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/26] remote-helpers: Fetch more than one ref in a batch Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/26] remote-helpers: Support custom transport options Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/26] Move WebDAV HTTP push under remote-curl Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-30 15:02 ` Tay Ray Chuan
2009-10-31 0:09 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-30 16:10 ` Tay Ray Chuan
2009-10-30 19:06 ` Clemens Buchacher
2009-10-30 23:20 ` Tay Ray Chuan
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/26] remote-helpers: return successfully if everything up-to-date Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/26] Git-aware CGI to provide dumb HTTP transport Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/26] Add stateless RPC options to upload-pack, receive-pack Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 3:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-29 15:26 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 20:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-30 23:59 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/26] Smart fetch and push over HTTP: server side Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/26] http-backend: add GIT_PROJECT_ROOT environment var Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/26] http-backend: reword some documentation Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/26] http-backend: use mod_alias instead of mod_rewrite Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/26] http-backend: add example for gitweb on same URL Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/26] http-backend: more explict LocationMatch Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/26] Discover refs via smart HTTP server when available Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/26] Smart push over HTTP: client side Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/26] Smart fetch " Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/26] Smart HTTP fetch: gzip requests Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/26] t5540-http-push: remove redundant fetches Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/26] test smart http fetch and push Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 0:31 ` Clemens Buchacher
2009-10-29 14:32 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 3:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-29 14:37 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 14:56 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-30 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-30 22:59 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-30 16:10 ` Tay Ray Chuan
2009-10-31 0:13 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-10-29 8:12 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/26] Return of smart HTTP Jakub Narebski
2009-10-29 15:28 ` Shawn O. Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7veioklloq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).