From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change mentions of "git programs" to "git commands" Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:39:50 -0700 Message-ID: <7veirgveq1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <4a7c3971.170d660a.3caa.20b3@mx.google.com> <20090811125813.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ori Avtalion To: Nanako Shiraishi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 13 00:40:07 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MbMUI-00050N-Mf for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:40:07 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752631AbZHLWj5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:39:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752579AbZHLWj5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:39:57 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:63176 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752023AbZHLWj4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:39:56 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CF88EC7; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:39:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE4758EC4; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:39:52 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20090811125813.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> (Nanako Shiraishi's message of "Tue\, 11 Aug 2009 12\:58\:13 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0F3BD000-8791-11DE-B36A-EAC21EFB4A78-77302942!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nanako Shiraishi writes: > I copy-edited Ori's patch for your convenience, and tried to clarify > the criteria you used to decide which "program" should become "command" > in the updated commit log message, in case you forgot to apply it > yourself. > > I just didn't want to see the time you and others spent on submitting > and reviewing wasted due to lack of resubmission of a revised patch. Very thoughtful. I appreciate your occasional "playing a capable project secretary", and I wish I see more like you. Indeed I've been swamped, and I tend to leave the final wrapping up to the original submitter and then forget. Thanks.