From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: EasyGit Integration Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:36:09 -0700 Message-ID: <7veittjdiu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20090609212748.GD13781@atjola.homenet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Scott Chacon , git list To: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Steinbrink X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 09 23:36:19 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ME8zT-00075o-0E for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:36:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754189AbZFIVgK convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:36:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755749AbZFIVgJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:36:09 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao106.cox.net ([68.230.241.40]:65438 "EHLO fed1rmmtao106.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754856AbZFIVgI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:36:08 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090609213611.JLBY25927.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net>; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:36:11 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.225.240.211]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id 1xc91c00M4aMwMQ04xc9jB; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:36:10 -0400 X-VR-Score: -200.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=609rUi2NPo9pCix4vm0A:9 a=wOCZITAad_ks5sdA-uzkLgQHawMA:4 a=_RhRFcbxBZMA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 In-Reply-To: <20090609212748.GD13781@atjola.homenet> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Bj?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=B6rn?= Steinbrink"'s message of "Tue\, 9 Jun 2009 23\:27\:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Bj=C3=B6rn Steinbrink writes: > On 2009.06.09 11:59:08 -0700, Scott Chacon wrote: >> * adds 'git resolved' for 'git add', which I hear all the time as >> being confusing > > Is "resolve" a plain alias, like "stage", or smart in deciding which > files it accepts? My gut feeling is that a plain alias might cause > trouble again when users get lazy and start to do "git resolve ." and > wonder why that adds new files. > > Iff such a "resolve" command is added, it should IMHO only serve the > purpose of changing the status of index entries marked as "unstaged", > and do nothing else that "add" can do. Very good point (modulo s/unstaged/unmerged/ I think).