From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 (resend)] graph API: Use horizontal lines for more compact graphs Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:35:18 -0700 Message-ID: <7veive6omx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20090422212812.GA30830@linux.vnet> <20090427154341.GA9818@linux.vnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin To: Allan Caffee X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 27 18:35:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LyTnr-0006eA-9X for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:35:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753067AbZD0Qf0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:35:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752563AbZD0QfZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:35:25 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:64771 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752247AbZD0QfZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:35:25 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E91312CA4; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:35:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83CF612CA2; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:35:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20090427154341.GA9818@linux.vnet> (Allan Caffee's message of "Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:43:41 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 683F7842-3349-11DE-AE91-D766E3C8547C-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Allan Caffee writes: > Junio, is this patch acceptable for inclusion? I think your patch is an improvement, and it is queued as part of the first batch post 1.6.3. As a general guideline: - after -rc0, we do not take any feature enhancement patches that has not been discussed on the list before -rc0 was tagged; - after -rc1, we only take documentation updates, trivial fixes, and fixes (not necessarily trivial) to issues introduced since the last release (i.e. regression fix); - after -rc2, we only take documentation updates and regression fixes; By the way, your Mail-Followup-To seems to be misconfigured.