From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: use "spurious .sp" XSLT if DOCBOOK_SUPPRESS_SP is set Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:25:01 -0700 Message-ID: <7veiwbk4pe.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vljql4586.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1238575834-17838-1-git-send-email-chris_johnsen@pobox.com> <20090401101400.GA26181@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chris Johnsen , Heiko Voigt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 02 07:27:10 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LpFSG-00044C-Tg for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:27:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751357AbZDBFZN (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:25:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751847AbZDBFZN (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:25:13 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:47534 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751357AbZDBFZL (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:25:11 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA36A67C0; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:25:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97EF7A67BF; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:25:03 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A1D407D8-1F46-11DE-B537-32B0EBB1AA3C-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > I think the "feature knob" makes sense. I don't know that it is worth > extensive testing with old releases. You have a pretty good guess about > which versions are affected, and people who experience the problem can > turn the knob. Your Makefile comments make it easy for them find the > knob once they see the breakage. > > It is probably worth mentioning in the release notes to give a heads-up, > though. Thanks.