From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] pretty.c: add %z specifier. Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:48:16 -0700 Message-ID: <7veja4u1gv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <5d46db230803201745mb736e98w4925e14b5d92d71d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Git Mailing List" To: "Govind Salinas" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 21 05:49:13 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JcZBn-0000vW-3D for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:49:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752789AbYCUEsb (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:48:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752641AbYCUEsb (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:48:31 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:39530 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752566AbYCUEsa (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:48:30 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794472572; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:48:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06292571; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:48:24 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5d46db230803201745mb736e98w4925e14b5d92d71d@mail.gmail.com> (Govind Salinas's message of "Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:45:26 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Govind Salinas" writes: > diff --git a/pretty.c b/pretty.c > index 703f521..fd155ec 100644 > --- a/pretty.c > +++ b/pretty.c > @@ -478,6 +478,9 @@ static size_t format_commit_item(struct strbuf > *sb, const char *placeholder, > case 'n': /* newline */ > strbuf_addch(sb, '\n'); > return 1; > + case 'z': /* null */ > + strbuf_addch(sb, '\0'); > + return 1; > } > > /* these depend on the commit */ I do not like this at all. Why aren't we doing %XX (2 hexadecimal digits for an octet)?