* [PATCH] apply: fix segfault
@ 2008-02-11 22:28 Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-11 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2008-02-11 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git, gitster
When the patch reports a line number that is larger than the number of
lines in the current version of the file, git-apply used to segfault.
This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
---
This just happened to me.
builtin-apply.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin-apply.c b/builtin-apply.c
index 4578542..ca7096f 100644
--- a/builtin-apply.c
+++ b/builtin-apply.c
@@ -1830,7 +1830,7 @@ static int find_pos(struct image *img,
return try_lno;
again:
- if (backwards_lno == 0 && forwards_lno == img->nr)
+ if (backwards_lno == 0 && forwards_lno >= img->nr)
break;
if (i & 1) {
--
1.5.4.1264.gb53928
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apply: fix segfault
2008-02-11 22:28 [PATCH] apply: fix segfault Johannes Schindelin
@ 2008-02-11 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-11 23:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-11 23:48 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2008-02-11 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: git, gitster
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> When the patch reports a line number that is larger than the number of
> lines in the current version of the file, git-apply used to segfault.
I have to wonder if the correct fix should be like this
instead. Under that condition, I think computation of the
initial "try" value already oversteps the line[] array for the
original image.
diff --git a/builtin-apply.c b/builtin-apply.c
index 2b8ba81..177f541 100644
--- a/builtin-apply.c
+++ b/builtin-apply.c
@@ -1809,6 +1809,9 @@ static int find_pos(struct image *img,
else if (match_end)
line = img->nr - preimage->nr;
+ if (line > preimage->nr)
+ line = preimage->nr;
+
try = 0;
for (i = 0; i < line; i++)
try += img->line[i].len;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apply: fix segfault
2008-02-11 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2008-02-11 23:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-11 23:48 ` Junio C Hamano
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2008-02-11 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: git
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
>> When the patch reports a line number that is larger than the number of
>> lines in the current version of the file, git-apply used to segfault.
>
> I have to wonder if the correct fix should be like this
> instead. Under that condition, I think computation of the
> initial "try" value already oversteps the line[] array for the
> original image.
With tests...
builtin-apply.c | 3 ++
t/t4105-apply-fuzz.sh | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin-apply.c b/builtin-apply.c
index 2b8ba81..177f541 100644
--- a/builtin-apply.c
+++ b/builtin-apply.c
@@ -1809,6 +1809,9 @@ static int find_pos(struct image *img,
else if (match_end)
line = img->nr - preimage->nr;
+ if (line > preimage->nr)
+ line = preimage->nr;
+
try = 0;
for (i = 0; i < line; i++)
try += img->line[i].len;
diff --git a/t/t4105-apply-fuzz.sh b/t/t4105-apply-fuzz.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..9c2a9f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t4105-apply-fuzz.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description='apply with fuzz and offset'
+
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+dotest () {
+
+ name="$1" && shift &&
+
+ test_expect_success "$name" "
+ git checkout-index -f -q -u file &&
+ git apply $* &&
+ diff -u expect file
+ "
+
+}
+
+test_expect_success setup '
+
+ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
+ do
+ echo $i
+ done >file &&
+ git update-index --add file &&
+ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a b c d e 8 9 10 11 12
+ do
+ echo $i
+ done >file &&
+ cat file >expect &&
+ git diff >O0.diff &&
+
+ sed -e "s/@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@/@@ -2,6 +2,11 @@/" >O1.diff O0.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@/@@ -7,6 +7,11 @@/" >O2.diff O0.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@/@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@/" >O3.diff O0.diff &&
+
+ sed -e "s/^ 5/ S/" >F0.diff O0.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/^ 5/ S/" >F1.diff O1.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/^ 5/ S/" >F2.diff O2.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/^ 5/ S/" >F3.diff O3.diff
+
+'
+
+dotest 'unmodified patch' O0.diff
+
+dotest 'minus offset' O1.diff
+
+dotest 'plus offset' O2.diff
+
+dotest 'big offset' O3.diff
+
+dotest 'fuzz with no offset' -C2 F0.diff
+
+dotest 'fuzz with minus offset' -C2 F1.diff
+
+dotest 'fuzz with plus offset' -C2 F2.diff
+
+dotest 'fuzz with big offset' -C2 F3.diff
+
+test_done
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apply: fix segfault
2008-02-11 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-11 23:28 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2008-02-11 23:48 ` Junio C Hamano
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2008-02-11 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: git, gitster
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
>> When the patch reports a line number that is larger than the number of
>> lines in the current version of the file, git-apply used to segfault.
>
> I have to wonder if the correct fix should be like this
> instead. Under that condition, I think computation of the
> initial "try" value already oversteps the line[] array for the
> original image.
>
> diff --git a/builtin-apply.c b/builtin-apply.c
> index 2b8ba81..177f541 100644
> --- a/builtin-apply.c
> +++ b/builtin-apply.c
> @@ -1809,6 +1809,9 @@ static int find_pos(struct image *img,
> else if (match_end)
> line = img->nr - preimage->nr;
>
> + if (line > preimage->nr)
> + line = preimage->nr;
> +
> try = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < line; i++)
> try += img->line[i].len;
Sorry, obviously the check should be against img->nr not the
preimage.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-11 23:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-11 22:28 [PATCH] apply: fix segfault Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-11 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-11 23:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-11 23:48 ` Junio C Hamano
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).