From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve@Freescale.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use $(RM) in makefiles instead of rm
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 01:33:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vejjbjsfl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 11843489233943-git-send-email-Emilian.Medve@Freescale.com
The title really should read "instead of 'rm -f'".
And who defines "RM = rm -f" when nothing is specified on the
command line? I'd assume the answer is "GNU make", and it
probably is true for all versions we care about, but I would
feel better if we have that spelled explicitly as the fallback
position, just like we define CC, AR and friends.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-14 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-13 17:48 [PATCH] Use $(RM) in makefiles instead of rm Emil Medve
2007-07-14 8:33 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vejjbjsfl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Emilian.Medve@Freescale.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox