From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: New way of tracking remote branches -- question Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:50:36 -0800 Message-ID: <7vejq9c9tf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <776323.21089.qm@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 06 00:50:43 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H2ypd-0004zE-Nt for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:50:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750896AbXAEXui (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:50:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750898AbXAEXui (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:50:38 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:58545 "EHLO fed1rmmtao03.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750896AbXAEXuh (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:50:37 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070105235037.ZEWL29122.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:50:37 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 7bpo1W00e1kojtg0000000; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:49:49 -0500 To: ltuikov@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <776323.21089.qm@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Luben Tuikov's message of "Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:02:31 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Luben Tuikov writes: > I can see that the remote heads are where they are supposed to be > but no local tracking heads are created (by default). I had > to do this manually. Ah, after firing off a few messages, I think I now guessed what you are talking about correctly. You are talking about the separate remote layout "git clone" creates, and talking about the fact that there is nothing in refs/heads/ except master while refs/remotes/origin/ mirrors what the remote side has faithfully, aren't you? If that is the case, I can explain. It is a good topic to talk about.