From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Default "tar" umask.. Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:40:58 -0800 Message-ID: <7vejq9drlx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vfyaxjiaj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <459EB78B.60000@lsrfire.ath.cx> <7vzm8xdw3t.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <459ED17E.2080101@lsrfire.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Linus Torvalds , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 05 23:41:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H2xkH-0003Xh-0D for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 23:41:05 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750824AbXAEWlB convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:41:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750826AbXAEWlB (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:41:01 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.241.34]:62037 "EHLO fed1rmmtao05.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750824AbXAEWlA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:41:00 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070105224059.FNPA15640.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:40:59 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 7agA1W00a1kojtg0000000; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:40:11 -0500 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Scharfe In-Reply-To: <459ED17E.2080101@lsrfire.ath.cx> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Scharfe's message of "Fri, 05 Jan 2007 23:30:22 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ren=E9 Scharfe writes: > [Junio: Sorry for resending, I somehow dropped the CC:'s the first ti= me.] I think that was my fault. I somehow dropped the CC:'s and resent without you to the list, and you responded to the first one. > ... Err, unless the target system has a group named git, which > would then be used instead. Come to think of it, having this "git" > group name in there is a bit strange and unnecessary. How about the > following patch? It is a very good point. I think this patch is sane, regardless of 002 vs 022 issue.