From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Example Cogito Addon - cogito-bundle Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:56:57 -0700 Message-ID: <7vejt5z3rq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200610180057.25411.jnareb@gmail.com> <20061018053647.GA3507@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20061018185225.GU20017@pasky.or.cz> <20061018185907.GV20017@pasky.or.cz> <7vy7rd1m4q.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061018191834.GA18829@spearce.org> <20061018204626.GA19194@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 18 23:57:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaJPK-0005Az-9e for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:57:03 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751502AbWJRV47 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:56:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751510AbWJRV47 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:56:59 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:15830 "EHLO fed1rmmtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751502AbWJRV46 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:56:58 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061018215658.TCTP2704.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:56:58 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id bxx11V0091kojtg0000000 Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:57:01 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:17:42 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > My personal suspicion is that we'll want to have a 64-bit index file some > day, and THAT is worthy of a format change. That day is not now, btw. It's > probably not even very close. Even the mozilla repo that was pushing the > limit was only doing so until it was optimized better, and now it's > apparently nowhere _near_ that limit. > > But even then, we might well want to update _just_ the index file format. We've tried this already, and I shelved the patch for 64-index for now due to exactly the same reasoning as yours (and it would have conflicted heavily with Shawn's windowed-mmap() patch). It involved updating just the index file format, so you are right on both counts. But you are always right anyway, so it may not be a news at all ;-).