From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Show project README if available Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:20:54 -0700 Message-ID: <7vejtg97qh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20061010025627.19317.70511.stgit@rover> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 10 05:21:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GX8BP-0002BF-Dy for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:21:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964773AbWJJDU5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 23:20:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964956AbWJJDU5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 23:20:57 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao08.cox.net ([68.230.241.31]:6113 "EHLO fed1rmmtao08.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964773AbWJJDUz (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 23:20:55 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061010032055.ZNTA22977.fed1rmmtao08.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 23:20:55 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id YTLx1V00T1kojtg0000000 Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:58 -0400 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20061010025627.19317.70511.stgit@rover> (Petr Baudis's message of "Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:56:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis writes: > If the project includes a README file, show it in the summary page. > The usual "this should be in the config file" argument does not apply here > since this can be larger and having such a big string in the config file > would be impractical. > > I don't know if this is suitable upstream, but it's one of the repo.or.cz > custom modifications that I've thought could be interesting for others > as well. I agree something like this would be very useful. I wonder how this should relate to .git/description file, though. In other words, it _might_ make sense to change where we show the contents of description right now to show the first line and take README from the same location. Having said that I'd take this as is in "next" and wait for public to decide having two separate files is Ok (which I suspect is the case) or we'd be better off in the longer term to try to minimize random files under $GIT_DIR.