From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] binary patch. Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 10:38:46 -0700 Message-ID: <7vejz8z80p.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vodyd2vqn.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vwtd10xyd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vy7xgzsiu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 05 19:39:37 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fc4H1-00027R-5O for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 05 May 2006 19:39:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751714AbWEERiv (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2006 13:38:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751701AbWEERiu (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2006 13:38:50 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao01.cox.net ([68.230.241.38]:27079 "EHLO fed1rmmtao01.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751697AbWEERis (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2006 13:38:48 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060505173847.YXRL25692.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Fri, 5 May 2006 13:38:47 -0400 To: Nicolas Pitre In-Reply-To: (Nicolas Pitre's message of "Fri, 05 May 2006 11:41:32 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nicolas Pitre writes: >> + delta = NULL; >> + deflated = deflate_it(two->ptr, two->size, &deflate_size); >> + if (one->size && two->size) { >> + delta = diff_delta(one->ptr, one->size, >> + two->ptr, two->size, >> + &delta_size, deflate_size); > > Here you probably want to use deflate_size-1 (deflate_size can't be 0). I am not sure if -1 is worth here. The delta is going to be deflated and hopefully gets a bit smaller, so if we really care that level of detail, it might be worth to do (deflate_size*3/2) or something like that here, use delta with or without deflate whichever is smaller, and mark the uncompressed delta with a different tag ("uncompressed delta"?). And for symmetry, to deal with uncompressible data, we may want to have "uncompressed literal" as well. >> + orig_size = delta_size; >> + if (delta) >> + delta = deflate_it(delta, delta_size, &delta_size); > > Here you're leaking the original delta buffer memory. Indeed. Thanks.