From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Rss produced by git is not valid xml? Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:37:21 -0800 Message-ID: <7vek5deam6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200511181833.40048.ismail@uludag.org.tr> <200511182127.06958.ismail@uludag.org.tr> <20051118200217.GA2831@vrfy.org> <200511182208.24248.ismail@uludag.org.tr> <20051118205513.GA3168@vrfy.org> <437E51EB.7050100@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 19 01:39:32 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EdGjO-0002Fs-Mi for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 01:37:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751157AbVKSAhY (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:37:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751238AbVKSAhY (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:37:24 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.241.34]:17034 "EHLO fed1rmmtao05.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751157AbVKSAhX (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:37:23 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051119003626.ETWY17838.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:36:26 -0500 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:25:05 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > Of course, you could equally easily (more so?) make it just a commit > trigger instead, which might well be the right thing. I think it is the right approach. As I repeatedly said (not that repeating things makes them right) on this list, I think that the interpretation of what is in commit log is a policy issue that is local to each project. > (And that still leaves the question open what to do about patches and > pulls, but if people mainly worry about newly written commit messages > itself, then at least that part is unambiguous). Pulls are "too late, sorry you have to live with it"; for patches, mailinfo and am have -u (I do not remember if I added it to applymbox -- I do not use applymbox anymore myself). Maybe we should make -u the default and countermand with -U to encourage the use of utf8 further?