From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkout-cache fix Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:54:17 -0700 Message-ID: <7vekccfceu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <118833cc05050911255e601fc@mail.gmail.com> <7vr7gewuxt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050510230357.GF26384@pasky.ji.cz> <7vsm0us5p5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <118833cc050511113122e2d17d@mail.gmail.com> <7vpsvxqwab.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vd5rxquo5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050511224044.GI22686@pasky.ji.cz> <7voebhnwey.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050512193838.GE324@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 12 21:47:37 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWJe9-0000Kr-8J for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2005 21:47:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262016AbVELTyq (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2005 15:54:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262032AbVELTyq (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2005 15:54:46 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:3530 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262016AbVELTyo (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2005 15:54:44 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.60.172]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050512195419.HLHB22430.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Thu, 12 May 2005 15:54:19 -0400 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20050512193838.GE324@pasky.ji.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Thu, 12 May 2005 21:38:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "PB" == Petr Baudis writes: PB> ... I've already seen something like this PB> in one commit merged from git-jc (IIRC some of the Ingo Molnar's leak PB> fixes),... Yes, I am very unhappy about that commit, too. I was mucking with jit-commit command at the time, and apparently used a buggy one to make that commit---I realized what happened much later when I reviewed the commit log and it was already too late (I told everybody that the tree is published and pullable by then). Sorry about that.