Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rebase: add --revisions flag
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:22:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vfx7lcj18.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091208144740.GA30830@redhat.com> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message of "Tue\, 8 Dec 2009 16\:47\:42 +0200")

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:

> Add --revisions flag to rebase, so that it can be used
> to apply an arbitrary range of commits on top
> of a current branch.

Many people wanted to have "pick many commits onto the current HEAD" and I
think it would be a natural, uncontroversial and welcome addition to allow
"git cherry-pick A..B".  In fact, historically, people who wanted to have
"pick many commits" complained that the "rebase" interface was backwards,
because it works in the _wrong_ direction for _their_ usecase.  Of course,
when you _are_ rebasing a branch on top of some other branch, the way
"rebase" currently works is the _right_ direction.

But I think it is a reasonable thing to _implement_ the feature to
range-pick commits reusing the sequencing logic already in "rebase" and
"rebase -i".  That essentially is what we wanted to do with "git
sequencer" that would be a sequencing logic backend shared among rebase,
cherry-pick, and perhaps am.

So perhaps a good way to move forward is to teach "git cherry-pick A..B"
to be a thin wrapper that invokes a new hidden mode of operation added to
"rebase" that is not advertised to the end user.

I would suggest calling the option to invoke that hidden mode not
"--revisions", but "--reverse" or "--opposite" or something of that
nature, though.  It makes "rebase" work in different direction.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-08 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-08 14:47 [PATCH RFC] rebase: add --revisions flag Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-08 16:08 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-08 16:11   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-08 16:41     ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-08 16:49       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-08 19:13         ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-08 16:14   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-08 16:37     ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-08 16:44       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-08 19:11         ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-08 20:00           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09 13:19             ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 14:02               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09  4:51         ` Miles Bader
2009-12-08 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-12-08 20:29   ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-12-09  5:30     ` Christian Couder
2009-12-09  6:52       ` Christian Couder
2009-12-09  9:08         ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-12-09  8:47   ` Peter Krefting
2009-12-09  9:37     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09 10:52       ` Peter Krefting
2009-12-09 11:22         ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 11:48           ` Andreas Schwab
2009-12-09 12:06             ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 12:07               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09 13:06                 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 19:46                   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-10  7:43                     ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-10 17:20                       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-11 11:07                         ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 13:20           ` Peter Krefting
2009-12-09 13:41             ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-10  8:43               ` Peter Krefting
2009-12-10 11:08                 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 10:38   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09 10:55     ` Matthieu Moy
2009-12-09 13:30   ` Matthieu Moy
2009-12-09 13:45     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09 14:01       ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 14:12         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09 20:10     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-13 22:47   ` David Kågedal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vfx7lcj18.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox