Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2009, #07; Sun, 29)
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:34:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vfx7wxy7r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vocmlbq8d.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sun\, 29 Nov 2009 02\:05\:38 -0800")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> This will be the last update before deciding what should go in 1.6.6-rc1
> and describes my current thinking.

I do not want to decide unilaterally what will be in and what will be left
out of 1.6.6, so here is a seocnd call for comments.

I said "Perhaps merge it to 'master' before 1.6.6-rc1?" for these:

> * uk/maint-shortlog-encoding (2009-11-25) 1 commit.
> * fc/send-email-envelope (2009-11-26) 2 commits.
> * jc/mailinfo-remove-brackets (2009-07-15) 1 commit.
> * tr/reset-checkout-patch (2009-11-19) 1 commit.
> * em/commit-claim (2009-11-04) 1 commit
> * cc/bisect-doc (2009-11-08) 1 commit
> * jc/pretty-lf (2009-10-04) 1 commit.
> * ns/send-email-no-chain-reply-to (2009-11-29) 1 commit

I didn't say so in the message but I think this is Ok for 1.6.6-rc1.

> * bw/diff-color-hunk-header (2009-11-27) 2 commits

I would love to see necessary fix-ups to make them suitable and include in
the 1.6.6 final for these:

> * jn/gitweb-blame (2009-11-24) 8 commits.

I am inclined to keep the rest out of 1.6.6.

Even though I did it myself, I am ambivalent about the diff.bwoutputonly
anti-procrastination measure.  The send-email one looked fine and is a
welcome addition to the "don't surprise users" effort to prepare for 1.7.0,
and diff.bwoutputonly is in a sense in a similar spirit, but an option to
keep an old and broken semantics feels somewhat wrong.

Also anybody has comments on the part for preparing users for 1.7.0 in the
draft release notes?

      reply	other threads:[~2009-11-30  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-29 10:05 What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2009, #07; Sun, 29) Junio C Hamano
2009-11-30  7:34 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vfx7wxy7r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox