From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] git-send-email --expand-aliases Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:25:44 -0800 Message-ID: <7vfx84jsef.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20091123221628.GE26810@ldl.fc.hp.com> <7v6390sqhz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20091124004554.GA27643@ldl.fc.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alex Chiang , Catalin Marinas , git@vger.kernel.org To: Karl Wiberg X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 24 08:26:02 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NCpmj-0002yY-KI for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:26:01 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757497AbZKXHZu (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:25:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757401AbZKXHZu (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:25:50 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:56106 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757301AbZKXHZt (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:25:49 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FF2A1BC9; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:25:55 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=mYS1NX4LVIjyqItIPypHI8Zf/Us=; b=FEn4Bm NleK/iSR4hCPr9ss/fcLXpJMN0k5m9l7KXi6SS8Jo5l45D7Wbzf3yqZQuzJ3DuPb JvCKEU7HomMLojI8mcVWvNWdWnXGq2iezwkzaH80nkLgLhgY2JG8+EibFqjbZM49 GNnv3mWm7j24Ye/cftq9jLkJR/DuoUvyElXZ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=eX+vFryKYNXbFqgf3CWbfXzIdfmwqsPt Hf01mMdOmNJhmZKpgBLJedhUb84sKXCSDyHVWJSuiPdborBB+bCoZwQIjqFenaeO vOlTmiMLuFcNmP2hfK3fElP3lDwJNIkJFdalRqbLUdd+blahE0YFWzLlhREk5HTO p2vbyLCwJ3g= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720BFA1BC8; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:25:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBF72A1BC7; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:25:45 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Karl Wiberg's message of "Tue\, 24 Nov 2009 08\:12\:17 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 981517A8-D8CA-11DE-8667-EF34BBB5EC2E-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Karl Wiberg writes: > I think that sounds like a splendid idea. It would be interesting to > see just how thin a wrapper around git send-email (and format-patch) > stg mail could become, without sacrificing features anyone actually > uses. The main complication could be stg mail's templates. Why do you even need to run format-patch? If stg mail supports a good templates to prepare message files, it would be natural to keep using that to prepare message files.