From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/3] Export thread-safe version of 'has_symlink_leading_path()' Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:33:36 -0700 Message-ID: <7vfxd1lh73.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20090707000500.GA5594@dpotapov.dyndns.org> <7vskh646bw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vws6h3ji4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vab3d3dpc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <86r5wmvk17.fsf@broadpark.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Dmitry Potapov , Git Mailing List To: Kjetil Barvik X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 12 23:33:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MQ6gB-0000o7-4g for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:33:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750831AbZGLVdo (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:33:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750739AbZGLVdn (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:33:43 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:56235 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750729AbZGLVdn (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:33:43 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D472327EC2; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:33:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C02327EBD; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:33:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <86r5wmvk17.fsf@broadpark.no> (Kjetil Barvik's message of "Sun\, 12 Jul 2009 02\:09\:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AC0E5B06-6F2B-11DE-9336-424D1A496417-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Kjetil Barvik writes: > I have looked at and tested (the version from the origin/pu branch, so > it contains the memset() line squashed in) patch 5/3, 6/3 and 7/3, and > all 3 patches looks correct, so you can add > > Reviewed-and-tested-by: Kjetil Barvik > > if you want to. Thanks. > But, I guess it is me which is a litle late to comment things, since I > already see that all 3 patches is in the pu, next and master branches > already, less than 3 days after beeing posted to the malinglist. > > But, would'nt it be a good thing to let all patches at least be in the > pu branch for minimum x days before entering next and master? Or: let > it go minimum x days after beeing posted to the list before entering > the next and master branch? x = 4? That number x depends on the quality of the patches and to a great extent how well I know the area of the code affected by the patch.