From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Who uses Signed-off-by and DCO? Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:59:40 -0700 Message-ID: <7vfxe52bk3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20090612084207.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> <20090612175105.GD6417@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nanako Shiraishi , git@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Tso X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 13 02:59:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MFHb4-0006nu-2U for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 02:59:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751580AbZFMA7k (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:59:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751275AbZFMA7j (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:59:39 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:57676 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750851AbZFMA7j (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:59:39 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090613005941.XZVN20430.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:59:41 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.225.240.211]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id 3Czh1c0034aMwMQ04Czhmp; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:59:41 -0400 X-VR-Score: -220.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=8UCnzis1hPQA:10 a=M92U2GiyUpJ0XrGiLd4A:9 a=23LciFGfGA2slOshP-BKTaCLe30A:4 X-CM-Score: 0.00 User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Theodore Tso writes: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:42:07AM +0900, Nanako Shiraishi wrote: >> git provides options and configuration variables to easily handle >> the Signed-off-by tag line. It is used to certify that the sender >> certifies the patch with the Developer's Certificate of Origin. >> >> I have read SubmittingPatches document and understand this >> convention is used by the Linux Kernel Project. >> >> I was giving a git introduction to students in my lab, and this >> question came up from one of them. How widely is this convention >> used? Are there projects other than the Linux Kernel and git itself? > > E2fsprogs uses the DCO convetion as well. True; I do not know if it counts as "other than the Kernel project" in the original question, though.