From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] best way to show diff of commit Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:27:09 -0800 Message-ID: <7vfxyuj70i.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20071125211831.GA21121@artemis.corp> <20071125212748.GB23820@fieldses.org> <20071125220902.GB21121@artemis.corp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Git ML To: Pierre Habouzit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Nov 25 23:27:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IwPwu-0007D3-Jb for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:27:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754392AbXKYW1T (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:27:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754508AbXKYW1T (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:27:19 -0500 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:55096 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752971AbXKYW1R (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:27:17 -0500 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4602F0; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:27:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0DD99B1A; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:27:33 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20071125220902.GB21121@artemis.corp> (Pierre Habouzit's message of "Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:09:02 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pierre Habouzit writes: > Hmm it doesn't because I would have to call git commit -v each time I > commit and well I _like_ having the status better. And moreover I want > the diff to go in a separated buffer too. I've never felt it a problem while editing the log message in Emacs. Don't enhanced vi implementations let you split the same buffer into two allowing you to view different portions of it these days?