From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-checkout: Test for relative path use. Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:06:54 -0800 Message-ID: <7vfxzfvlch.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <11945685673280-git-send-email-dsymonds@gmail.com> <11945685732608-git-send-email-dsymonds@gmail.com> <47340895.6000403@viscovery.net> <7v7ikrx2st.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , "Johannes Sixt" , git@vger.kernel.org, "Johannes Schindelin" , "Andreas Ericsson" To: "David Symonds" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 09 10:07:26 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IqPpk-0002iv-9X for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:07:24 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751420AbXKIJHK (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2007 04:07:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751392AbXKIJHI (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2007 04:07:08 -0500 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:36409 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751411AbXKIJHF (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2007 04:07:05 -0500 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE732F2; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 04:07:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710AC91EFB; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 04:07:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (David Symonds's message of "Fri, 9 Nov 2007 19:14:44 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "David Symonds" writes: > So what would you prefer? Bracketing the whole test in parentheses > looks ugly, but I can do that if that's the only option. If I look at > t5510-fetch.sh (one of yours, Junio), there is no directory > restoration in the case of test failure, as in my original patch. Yes, that is what I was referring to as "bad examples". The way t4116 goes down to different directory do not look ugly to me.