From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: confused about preserved permissions Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:57:32 -0700 Message-ID: <7vfy2avg2b.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20070820164411.GA15637@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net> <6031FB22-648E-47DE-92EE-2E7255322C27@lrde.epita.fr> <7v8x83i5ma.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20070823060052.GA25153@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net> <85mywiixtp.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Kastrup , git discussion list To: Benoit SIGOURE X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 23 09:57:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IO7ZW-0008Gs-FX for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:57:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752024AbXHWH5j (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:57:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751978AbXHWH5i (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:57:38 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:57865 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751090AbXHWH5i (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:57:38 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779DA126A81; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:57:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Benoit SIGOURE's message of "Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:48:23 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Benoit SIGOURE writes: > Let's look at the problem from another point of view then: I want my > *working tree* to be group readable even though my umask is 066. I have to wonder if there is any sane development tool that supports that kind of thing. E.g. vi, emacs, gcc,...? If you allowed a tool to do that, what's the point of having a umask?