From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: make search form generate pathinfo-style URLs Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:11:23 -0700 Message-ID: <7vfy46wgdg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <1183057027.6108.4.camel@mattlaptop2> <1183402981.2664.10.camel@mattlaptop2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Matt McCutchen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 03 01:11:41 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I5V3P-00086c-Dh for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 01:11:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756992AbXGBXL3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2007 19:11:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757016AbXGBXL3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2007 19:11:29 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.241.42]:50303 "EHLO fed1rmmtao104.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756940AbXGBXL2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2007 19:11:28 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070702231127.VMWV1257.fed1rmmtao104.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 19:11:27 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id JnBS1X00h1kojtg0000000; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:11:27 -0400 cc: Petr Baudis , Jakub Narebski , Luben Tuikov User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Matt McCutchen writes: > I sent this patch four days ago but no one has commented or done > anything about it. Please clue me in: is this typical, or did I do > something wrong or do I need to do something else? Yes, it sometimes happens to patches to some areas. No, you did not do anything wrong as far as I can see. Yes, sending this kind of reminder out is exactly what is needed. I have three recent patches from you on gitweb in my patch queue. Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: snapshot cleanups & support for offering multiple formats Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:02:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1183053733.6108.0.camel@mattlaptop2> Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: make search form generate pathinfo-style URLs Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:57:07 -0400 Message-ID: <1183057027.6108.4.camel@mattlaptop2> Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: make "No commits" in project list gray, not bold green Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:15:22 -0400 Message-ID: <1183068922.6108.8.camel@mattlaptop2> There are people whom I consider "gitweb folks", who are more familiar with, and more importantly who are more interested in, gitweb than I am. Having good "subsystem people" makes gitweb a lower-priority area to myself, and for these patches it made even so that nobody commented on them. I should have asked Ack/Nack/Comments from gitweb folks much earlier, but was a bit too loaded with the day job. Sorry about that. So, gitweb folks, what do you think about these patches?