From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git merge and merge message Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:03:32 -0700 Message-ID: <7vfy8busjv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200703111505.l2BF54Kq006625@localhost.localdomain> <20070311160424.GA629@fieldses.org> <200703111815.l2BIFHbq010315@localhost.localdomain> <45F46713.6030702@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , Linus Torvalds , Xavier Maillard , "J. Bruce Fields" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 12 03:03:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HQZt9-0004UQ-51 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 03:03:51 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751891AbXCLCDe (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:03:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751956AbXCLCDe (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:03:34 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39]:46414 "EHLO fed1rmmtao107.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751891AbXCLCDe (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:03:34 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070312020333.QHOV321.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:03:33 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Ze3Y1W00h1kojtg0000000; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:03:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:41:48 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: >> This feature would be good for top-level trees and for major subsystem >> trees IMO. > > What? You should sign-off on stuff you did not review? Or do you review > the stuff _before_ merging? I don't. Actually I've done a few merging recently, and I do review the stuff before merging. It is easier to review after making a merge, so technically the review happens _after_ merging but if I do not like what the other branch has, I can throw it away with "reset --hard ORIG_HEAD", which means in practice the review is done before.