From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: start to generate PATH_INFO URLs Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:36:22 -0700 Message-ID: <7vfye5pai1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060929221641.GC2871@admingilde.org> <20061003171229.GN2871@admingilde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 03 19:38:35 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUoCM-0002WZ-6X for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:36:54 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030341AbWJCRgZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:36:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030364AbWJCRgZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:36:25 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao08.cox.net ([68.230.241.31]:49874 "EHLO fed1rmmtao08.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030341AbWJCRgX (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:36:23 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061003173623.KXNO22977.fed1rmmtao08.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:36:23 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id VtcG1V00G1kojtg0000000 Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:36:16 -0400 To: Martin Waitz In-Reply-To: <20061003171229.GN2871@admingilde.org> (Martin Waitz's message of "Tue, 3 Oct 2006 19:12:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Martin Waitz writes: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 02:16:05PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> >> I have just modified href() to be able to use it for actions which don't >> need the ?p= parameter... and you didn't take into consideration the case >> when $params{'project'} is set, but undefined. > > is this handled correctly in the second patch which got committed to > next? I did only a light testing last night and I do not remember testing this particular issue I did not see an obvious breakage. Could you two please verify and send in fixes if you find any more issues around this area? I think Jakub's suggestion to respond in PATH_INFO to requests that does use PATH_INFO is a good one.