From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: [RFC] "clone --naked"? Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:47:50 -0800 Message-ID: <7vfynoy5p5.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <43CB57A0.29999.F89D30F@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: users@kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 16 08:48:01 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyP5s-0001Y2-UK for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:48:01 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932241AbWAPHr6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:47:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932244AbWAPHr6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:47:58 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.241.35]:27028 "EHLO fed1rmmtao04.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932241AbWAPHr5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:47:57 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060116074531.CNXD17690.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:45:31 -0500 To: "Ulrich Windl" In-Reply-To: <43CB57A0.29999.F89D30F@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de> (Ulrich Windl's message of "Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:21:53 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Ulrich Windl" writes: > On 14 Jan 2006 at 15:39, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > [...] >> BTW, I have been meaning to make this easier, by introducing a >> new option to "git clone", like this: > ... > You must be over 21 to use --naked, however ;-) > Maybe you find a better word. Linus seems to use word "bare" sometimes. Checking the git-core documentation, repository-layout documentation first used the word naked on Sep 1 2005, while there is no mention of "bare" repository anywhere. Maybe "bare" is preferred? I hope you do not mind my sending this message out to git list to take a quick poll.