From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Subject: Re: Darcs-git: a few notes for Git hackers
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 12:25:06 -0700
Message-ID: <7vfywothpp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0505151204230.2136-100000@bellevue.puremagic.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>,
	Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek@pps.jussieu.fr>,
	<git@vger.kernel.org>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 15 21:25:28 2005
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DXOjl-0002bz-QR
	for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 15 May 2005 21:25:18 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261205AbVEOTZM (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git@m.gmane.org>);
	Sun, 15 May 2005 15:25:12 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261207AbVEOTZM
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Sun, 15 May 2005 15:25:12 -0400
Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.241.34]:53715 "EHLO
	fed1rmmtao05.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S261205AbVEOTZJ (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 15 May 2005 15:25:09 -0400
Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.60.172])
          by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP
          id <20050515192506.CNCM8651.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>;
          Sun, 15 May 2005 15:25:06 -0400
To: Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0505151204230.2136-100000@bellevue.puremagic.com> (Brad
 Roberts's message of "Sun, 15 May 2005 12:06:27 -0700 (PDT)")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org

>>>>> "BR" == Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> writes:

>> I've merged some of the minor stuff for now.

BR> Cool, though there appears to have been some objections. :)

I do not have any problem with what the _patch_ does at all.  I
had more trouble in the process of how the patch appeared in
git-pb tree, and I still do.

Please consider the revert request retracted.  Request to
forewarn people in the mailing list still stands.