From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] receive-pack: Wrap status reports inside side-band-64k Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:19:46 -0800 Message-ID: <7vhbpvxr3x.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1265403462-20572-1-git-send-email-spearce@spearce.org> <1265403462-20572-6-git-send-email-spearce@spearce.org> <7vd40j1j2a.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20100205215344.GC27498@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 05 23:20:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NdWWv-0006OF-Jj for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:20:01 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933917Ab0BEWTz (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:19:55 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:41014 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933910Ab0BEWTz (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:19:55 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCD397D0F; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:19:53 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=TJPdX7jC+RSSh4pE62Tg1IQbXhE=; b=aqzO6v rLKByHliFmhE2lIl5lY8SL0R8EZpk6JNoP9mOL65eC57HtrDZG4Rd1RjxHUhNkk2 7JQX+CtLbAtk/okCxzXrohCgP/pHA9WWa+sSaG0XUIgPn8faL+dK4ww4M1KPHTJz cNl1aOxBnHk5JU1GNjAy87f2e6bf18FqL/Sxk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=tpeDkIMwRwirFMpFFgI8NZbEjr98TZmT WHBBe7vxili2MOiNpn2l9nmW/72XDhENOeO0W2J0vkoUjwo1g2lQnXDVljnCT03h BIQlID6QH1detFRutmpdkrb9VIxUDCYnFX55PDOA/T4fKFzWb9W0cqs/ilyfsmjR +gq693TXJS8= Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AC497D0E; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:19:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 698C597D0D; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:19:48 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20100205215344.GC27498@spearce.org> (Shawn O. Pearce's message of "Fri\, 5 Feb 2010 13\:53\:44 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 93EC142E-12A4-11DF-84E6-6AF7ED7EF46B-77302942!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: > I was following the existing convention of use_sideband is > maximum-packet-size in server code, and boolean in client code. Ahh, I forgot about that -- we did it when we introduced different packet size limit. Now it all makes sense. Thanks.