From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] difftool: add support for an extended revision syntax
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:22:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vhc1j6czf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090323163343.GB16258@gmail.com> (David Aguilar's message of "Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:33:44 -0700")
David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com> writes:
> Keep in mind that the syntax that this patch added does not have file~3
> = HEAD~3. file~3 means finding file as it existed 3 changes-to-file
> ago, which is != to HEAD~3 if file did not change in the last 3 commits.
If your motive is to introduce inconsistency to the UI by adding this kind
of new notation _only to difftool_, I have to reconsider moving it out of
contrib/ area.
While I do not fundamentally oppose to add convenient notations for useful
concepts, you need to start at making sure if this "three changes ago" is
a well defined concept to begin with.
And it is not a well defined concept in a merge-heavy environment, unless
you define what you mean by "three changes ago".
If you consider this history:
---Y---o---X---M---o mainline = HEAD
/
---A---B---C topic
where A, B, C and X, Y are the only commits that touched the file you are
interested in, how do you define 3-changes-ago?
Maybe X was just a totally uninteresting typofix to a comment, while A, B
and C were adding a very interesting new feature. Don't forget that M
also changes the file from either of its parents (X or C). Does M count
as the last change? Or does it not count because it is just a mechanical
unconflicting merge? Which one of X or C is the penultimate change? The
one with an earlier committer timestamp? Tiebreaking with timestamps is
known to be flawed in the presense of clock skew.
For the consistency of the UI, "starting at HEAD, following first-parent
ancestry, find N-th commit that touches the path, ignoring all the side
branches" MUST be the semantics of a notation that uses tilde followed by
number (so file~3 must mean Y in the above picture), because HEAD~3 is
defined as "three parents ago, only following the first parent ancestry".
Anything else will invite user confusion.
But I do not think it is necessarily useful to follow only the first
parent ancestry to find "three-changes ago" (if such a concept exists).
If you want a notation that means something else, such as X (because
chronologically the commits that touched the file are M, C and X in the
ideal world that everybody has well synchronized clock), you shouldn't use
tilde-number notation but use something else.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-23 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-23 10:15 [PATCH] difftool: add support for an extended revision syntax David Aguilar
2009-03-23 14:51 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-03-23 16:33 ` David Aguilar
2009-03-23 16:46 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-03-23 23:22 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-03-23 23:33 ` David Aguilar
2009-03-23 23:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-27 15:59 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-03-27 16:28 ` David Aguilar
2009-03-27 17:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-27 18:16 ` David Aguilar
2009-03-27 17:36 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vhc1j6czf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=davvid@gmail.com \
--cc=git@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).