From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: suggest name for OPML view Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:18:14 -0800 Message-ID: <7vhc4cluex.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1230900570-25324-1-git-send-email-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Narebski , Petr Baudis To: Giuseppe Bilotta X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 06 09:20:04 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LK7AG-0007cQ-6E for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:19:52 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751321AbZAFISW (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 03:18:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751318AbZAFISW (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 03:18:22 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:40204 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750944AbZAFISV (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 03:18:21 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8A78DE27; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 03:18:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C57D8DE25; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 03:18:15 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9475D3A6-DBCA-11DD-A254-5720C92D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Giuseppe Bilotta writes: > Suggest opml.xml as name for OPML view by providing the appropriate > header, consistently with similar usage in project_index view. > > Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta I think this makes sense; will apply unless there is any objection.