From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Patch for NO_R_TO_GCC_LINKER Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:50:00 -0700 Message-ID: <7vhc9olh4n.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vy730n0ac.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Giovanni Funchal" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 13 23:51:19 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KTOFQ-0004hv-Ro for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:51:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752588AbYHMVuN (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:50:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752626AbYHMVuN (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:50:13 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:47523 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751655AbYHMVuM (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:50:12 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C550358D7F; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:50:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D174D58D7B; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:50:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Giovanni Funchal's message of "Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:20:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CD5B0AEE-6981-11DD-8731-3113EBD4C077-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Giovanni Funchal" writes: > My changes should not break a lot of people's setups. Most people will > find the new default better because it works straight on > linux/windows. My understanding is that Linux/Windows people won't be using NO_R_TO_GCC_LINKER. What I was afraid of breaking was people who have their own config.mak (which is included by Makefile) to customize the way the linkage works, setting NO_R_TO_GCC_LINKER appropriately. Doesn't your change to the Makefile in a way not to pay attention to the variable break them?