From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Restricting access to a branch Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 17:17:25 -0700 Message-ID: <7vhccrxkdm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080521163616.31fad56f@extreme> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 22 02:18:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JyyVq-0004cH-Go for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 02:18:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937669AbYEVARi (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 20:17:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S937659AbYEVARi (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 20:17:38 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:59451 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937550AbYEVARg (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 20:17:36 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99ED1195C; Wed, 21 May 2008 20:17:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145D61956; Wed, 21 May 2008 20:17:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080521163616.31fad56f@extreme> (Stephen Hemminger's message of "Wed, 21 May 2008 16:36:16 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 78CAD470-2794-11DD-98BD-80001473D85F-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Stephen Hemminger writes: > Is there some standard way to freeze a branch and not allow anymore changes to > be pushed? > > Yes, I know it is possible by playing with hook files, but that doesn't seem > very admin friendly. If you do not want to use hooks, then the answer is no. Sorry.