From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] Support TEST_GIT_PATH variable for the path for the git to test Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:01:48 -0800 Message-ID: <7vhcfv4ekj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7v63wch9ia.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v63wb5zec.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vpruj4ge1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 26 22:03:00 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JU6wm-0002Ef-3l for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:02:44 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753650AbYBZVCG (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:02:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754957AbYBZVCF (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:02:05 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:57382 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751456AbYBZVCE (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:02:04 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247EF165D; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:02:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769D6165B; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:01:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Barkalow's message of "Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:46:17 -0500 (EST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Daniel Barkalow writes: >> Ok, so even "installed" case need to rely on "test-blah" we build. > > Right. Would it be okay to build those into t/helpers/* or something, > instead of into the project root, so that they're just naturally separate > from the actual program? Yeah, it sounds like a plan.