* [PATCH] Fix "git clone" for git:// protocol
@ 2008-02-09 16:58 Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-09 17:16 ` Daniel Barkalow
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2008-02-09 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git, gitster, barkalow
In the commit "Reduce the number of connects when fetching", we checked
the return value of git_connect() to see if the connection was successful.
However, for the git:// protocol, there is no need to have another
process, so the return value is NULL.
The thing is: git_connect() does not return at all if it fails, so we need
not check the return value of git_connect().
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
---
builtin-fetch-pack.c | 16 ++++++----------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin-fetch-pack.c b/builtin-fetch-pack.c
index f401352..184782f 100644
--- a/builtin-fetch-pack.c
+++ b/builtin-fetch-pack.c
@@ -707,17 +707,13 @@ int cmd_fetch_pack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
conn = git_connect(fd, (char *)dest, args.uploadpack,
args.verbose ? CONNECT_VERBOSE : 0);
- if (conn) {
- get_remote_heads(fd[0], &ref, 0, NULL, 0);
-
- ref = fetch_pack(&args, fd, conn, ref, dest, nr_heads, heads, NULL);
- close(fd[0]);
- close(fd[1]);
- if (finish_connect(conn))
- ref = NULL;
- } else {
+ get_remote_heads(fd[0], &ref, 0, NULL, 0);
+
+ ref = fetch_pack(&args, fd, conn, ref, dest, nr_heads, heads, NULL);
+ close(fd[0]);
+ close(fd[1]);
+ if (finish_connect(conn))
ref = NULL;
- }
ret = !ref;
if (!ret && nr_heads) {
--
1.5.4.1264.g42770c
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix "git clone" for git:// protocol
2008-02-09 16:58 [PATCH] Fix "git clone" for git:// protocol Johannes Schindelin
@ 2008-02-09 17:16 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-02-09 18:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 3:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Barkalow @ 2008-02-09 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: git, gitster
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> In the commit "Reduce the number of connects when fetching", we checked
> the return value of git_connect() to see if the connection was successful.
>
> However, for the git:// protocol, there is no need to have another
> process, so the return value is NULL.
>
> The thing is: git_connect() does not return at all if it fails, so we need
> not check the return value of git_connect().
Huh. Sure enough. Actually, there's a similar problem in transport.c,
where it assumes that the return value of git_connect is non-zero, which
makes it not reuse the connection (not that you can really tell). It might
be good to roll in a fix for that. Or maybe git_connect should return a
pointer to a static struct child_process if it doesn't need a subprocess,
just to distinguish "we're doing it ourselves" from "it's not being done"?
If not, maybe the variables that store the return from git_connect should
be renamed to "subproc" or something that doesn't suggest they can't be
NULL if you're actually connected.
-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix "git clone" for git:// protocol
2008-02-09 17:16 ` Daniel Barkalow
@ 2008-02-09 18:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 3:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2008-02-09 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Barkalow; +Cc: git, gitster
Hi,
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > In the commit "Reduce the number of connects when fetching", we
> > checked the return value of git_connect() to see if the connection was
> > successful.
> >
> > However, for the git:// protocol, there is no need to have another
> > process, so the return value is NULL.
> >
> > The thing is: git_connect() does not return at all if it fails, so we
> > need not check the return value of git_connect().
>
> Huh. Sure enough. Actually, there's a similar problem in transport.c,
> where it assumes that the return value of git_connect is non-zero, which
> makes it not reuse the connection (not that you can really tell). It might
> be good to roll in a fix for that. Or maybe git_connect should return a
> pointer to a static struct child_process if it doesn't need a subprocess,
> just to distinguish "we're doing it ourselves" from "it's not being done"?
Yeah, I like that. Will do that tomorrow.
Ciao,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Fix "git clone" for git:// protocol
2008-02-09 17:16 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-02-09 18:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2008-02-10 3:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 3:14 ` Daniel Barkalow
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2008-02-10 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Barkalow; +Cc: git, gitster
In ba227857(Reduce the number of connects when fetching), we checked
the return value of git_connect() to see if the connection was
successful.
However, for the git:// protocol, there is no need to have another
process, so the return value was NULL.
Now, it makes sense to assume the rule that git_connect() will return
NULL if it fails (at the moment, it die()s if it fails), so return
a dummy child process.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
---
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > In the commit "Reduce the number of connects when fetching",
> > we checked the return value of git_connect() to see if the
> > connection was successful.
> >
> > However, for the git:// protocol, there is no need to have
> > another process, so the return value is NULL.
> >
> > The thing is: git_connect() does not return at all if it
> > fails, so we need not check the return value of git_connect().
>
> Huh. Sure enough. Actually, there's a similar problem in
> transport.c, where it assumes that the return value of
> git_connect is non-zero, which makes it not reuse the connection
> (not that you can really tell). It might be good to roll in a
> fix for that. Or maybe git_connect should return a pointer to a
> static struct child_process if it doesn't need a subprocess,
> just to distinguish "we're doing it ourselves" from "it's not
> being done"? If not, maybe the variables that store the return
> from git_connect should be renamed to "subproc" or something
> that doesn't suggest they can't be NULL if you're actually
> connected.
How about this?
connect.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/connect.c b/connect.c
index 3aefd4a..700ceba 100644
--- a/connect.c
+++ b/connect.c
@@ -472,14 +472,18 @@ char *get_port(char *host)
return NULL;
}
+static struct child_process no_fork;
+
/*
- * This returns NULL if the transport protocol does not need fork(2), or a
- * struct child_process object if it does. Once done, finish the connection
- * with finish_connect() with the value returned from this function
- * (it is safe to call finish_connect() with NULL to support the former
- * case).
+ * This returns a dummy child_process if the transport protocol does not
+ * need fork(2), or a struct child_process object if it does. Once done,
+ * finish the connection with finish_connect() with the value returned from
+ * this function (it is safe to call finish_connect() with NULL to support
+ * the former case).
*
- * If it returns, the connect is successful; it just dies on errors.
+ * If it returns, the connect is successful; it just dies on errors (this
+ * will hopefully be changed in a libification effort, to return NULL when
+ * the connection failed).
*/
struct child_process *git_connect(int fd[2], const char *url_orig,
const char *prog, int flags)
@@ -577,7 +581,7 @@ struct child_process *git_connect(int fd[2], const char *url_orig,
free(url);
if (free_path)
free(path);
- return NULL;
+ return &no_fork;
}
conn = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*conn));
@@ -635,7 +639,7 @@ struct child_process *git_connect(int fd[2], const char *url_orig,
int finish_connect(struct child_process *conn)
{
int code;
- if (!conn)
+ if (!conn || conn == &no_fork)
return 0;
code = finish_command(conn);
--
1.5.4.1264.g42770c
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix "git clone" for git:// protocol
2008-02-10 3:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2008-02-10 3:14 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-02-10 4:15 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Barkalow @ 2008-02-10 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: git, gitster
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> How about this?
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix "git clone" for git:// protocol
2008-02-10 3:14 ` Daniel Barkalow
@ 2008-02-10 4:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-10 12:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2008-02-10 4:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Barkalow; +Cc: Johannes Schindelin, git
Thanks. The patch makes sense.
I wonder this deserves a new test case to protect the fix from
future regressions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix "git clone" for git:// protocol
2008-02-10 4:15 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2008-02-10 12:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 13:45 ` [PATCH] Add a test for git-daemon and clone via " Johannes Schindelin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2008-02-10 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Daniel Barkalow, git
Hi,
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thanks. The patch makes sense.
>
> I wonder this deserves a new test case to protect the fix from future
> regressions.
It would probably make sense; this would also exercise git-daemon for the
first time in our test suite.
Will work on it right away.
Ciao,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Add a test for git-daemon and clone via git:// protocol
2008-02-10 12:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2008-02-10 13:45 ` Johannes Schindelin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2008-02-10 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Daniel Barkalow, git
The new test, t5703-daemon.sh, sets up a simple git-daemon at port 8111
(you can override it with the environment variable GIT_DAEMON_TEST_PORT),
and then tries to clone via git:// from it, first without the
git-daemon-export-ok file (which should fail), and then with it (which
should succeed).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
---
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Thanks. The patch makes sense.
> >
> > I wonder this deserves a new test case to protect the fix from
> > future regressions.
>
> It would probably make sense; this would also exercise
> git-daemon for the first time in our test suite.
How's this?
t/t5703-daemon.sh | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t5703-daemon.sh
diff --git a/t/t5703-daemon.sh b/t/t5703-daemon.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..10696a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t5703-daemon.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description='git daemon and cloning via git:// protocol'
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+test_expect_success 'setup' '
+
+ mkdir first &&
+ (cd first &&
+ git init &&
+ echo biomimicry > ted &&
+ git add ted &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m initial &&
+ git gc)
+
+'
+
+PORT=${GIT_DAEMON_TEST_PORT:-8111}
+
+start_daemon () {
+ trap 'kill "$DAEMON_PID"' 0
+ git daemon --base-path="$(pwd)" \
+ --port="$PORT" \
+ --detach \
+ --pid-file=pid-file \
+ -- "$(pwd)/first"
+ DAEMON_PID=$(cat pid-file)
+}
+
+test_expect_success 'daemon' '
+
+ start_daemon &&
+ test -f pid-file
+
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'clone fails without export-ok' '
+
+ ! git clone git://127.0.0.1:"$PORT"/first second
+
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'clone succeeds with export-ok' '
+
+ : > first/.git/git-daemon-export-ok &&
+ git clone git://127.0.0.1:"$PORT"/first second &&
+ for f in refs/heads/master objects/pack/*.pack
+ do
+ cmp first/.git/$f second/.git/$f || break
+ done
+
+'
+
+test_done
--
1.5.4.1264.gb53928
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-10 13:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-09 16:58 [PATCH] Fix "git clone" for git:// protocol Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-09 17:16 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-02-09 18:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 3:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 3:14 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-02-10 4:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-10 12:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 13:45 ` [PATCH] Add a test for git-daemon and clone via " Johannes Schindelin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).