From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't mention index refreshing side effect in git-status docs Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:33:19 -0800 Message-ID: <7vhciss1ww.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20071209082133.GA2257@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Steven Grimm , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Dec 09 09:34:24 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J1HcF-0006aZ-I5 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 09:34:23 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753550AbXLIIde (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2007 03:33:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753394AbXLIIde (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2007 03:33:34 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:47893 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751534AbXLIIdd (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2007 03:33:33 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6445838; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 03:33:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793DA5837; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 03:33:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20071209082133.GA2257@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sun, 9 Dec 2007 03:21:34 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > If there is some desire to document the side effect, I think we should > at least remove the mention of speeding up git-diff (which is just wrong > now). Why is it "just wrong"? Having to squelch the false hits and to run auto-refresh are both unnecessary overhead if your index is fresh.