From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Introduce commit notes Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:05:01 -0700 Message-ID: <7vhco5cixe.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vlkdhck8d.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alberto Bertogli , git@vger.kernel.org, Johan Herland To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 16 02:05:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IAE5y-0008LA-VK for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 02:05:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757799AbXGPAFG (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:05:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763846AbXGPAFF (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:05:05 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.241.43]:47216 "EHLO fed1rmmtao103.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763840AbXGPAFD (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:05:03 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070716000501.ROBQ1358.fed1rmmtao103.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:05:01 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id Q0501X00W1kojtg0000000; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:05:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7vlkdhck8d.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:36:50 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > I wonder if it is worth using the fan-out tree structure for the > underlying "note" trees, as the notes-index would be the primary > way to access them. Actually now I think about it I think this was a stupid suggestion. Creation of a new note in a reasonably well populated note tree would be made 256-fold more efficient by having the fan-out, as write-tree does not have to recompute the other 255 tree objects thanks to the cache-tree data being fresh.