From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] connect: display connection progress Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 13:41:31 -0700 Message-ID: <7vhcqpbs78.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070506195230.GA30339@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 06 22:41:42 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HknXz-0002R1-U0 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 22:41:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753301AbXEFUld (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 16:41:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753376AbXEFUld (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 16:41:33 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao106.cox.net ([68.230.241.40]:39962 "EHLO fed1rmmtao106.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753301AbXEFUlc (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 16:41:32 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070506204132.ZCPM6556.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sun, 6 May 2007 16:41:32 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id vwhX1W0031kojtg0000000; Sun, 06 May 2007 16:41:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070506195230.GA30339@mellanox.co.il> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message of "Sun, 6 May 2007 22:52:30 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > Make git notify the user about host resolution/connection attempts. This > is useful both as a progress indicator on slow links, and helps reassure the > user there are no DNS/firewall problems. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > > --- > > I find the following useful. > This currently only covers native git protocol. I expect it would > be easy to extend this to other protocols, if there's interest. > Opinions? I think giving this kind of feedback makes a lot of sense, from both the "assurance" point of view and also debuggability. But please do this only under verbose, or squelch it if "quiet" is asked.