From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-email: allow sendmail binary to be used instead of SMTP Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:13:25 -0700 Message-ID: <7vhd3rgfey.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <1147660345772-git-send-email-normalperson@yhbt.net> <7vpsifx2b7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060515092704.GB6855@localdomain> <7vmzdjtya4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060515210110.GR32076@h4x0r5.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 15 23:13:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfkNm-0004ov-NS for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:13:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965233AbWEOVNg (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 17:13:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965234AbWEOVNf (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 17:13:35 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtai16.cox.net ([68.230.241.43]:18869 "EHLO fed1rmmtai16.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965233AbWEOVNf (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 17:13:35 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060515211326.QTJT19284.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 15 May 2006 17:13:26 -0400 To: Ryan Anderson In-Reply-To: <20060515210110.GR32076@h4x0r5.com> (Ryan Anderson's message of "Mon, 15 May 2006 17:01:21 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ryan Anderson writes: > I think, in practice, that /usr/lib/sendmail will exist anywhere you hve > something running on port 25, at least on unixy machines. In my > searches at an old job, that appeared to be the canonical place to call > sendmail from, and every MTA appears to provide an appropriate binary > there. > > So, I'm not overly worried about it. exim, postfix and friends? I used to know somebody who port-forwarded 25/tcp to central smtp server from smaller machines in her intranet installation, but I would say that is rare. I am not worried about it either; I just wanted to make sure _somebody_ thought the potential issues through and agreed with the change the patch makes.