From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: diffstat wierdness with 'git format-patch' output Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:10:18 -0800 Message-ID: <7vhd72v2jp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060214055425.GA32261@kroah.com> <20060214055648.GA592@kroah.com> <7vveviv5d1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060214063420.GA11851@kroah.com> <20060214064256.GA19667@kroah.com> <20060214065224.GA20541@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 14 08:10:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F8uKt-0001uF-FE for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:10:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030360AbWBNHKk (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:10:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030503AbWBNHKk (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:10:40 -0500 Received: from [68.230.241.34] ([68.230.241.34]:34251 "EHLO fed1rmmtao05.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030360AbWBNHKk (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:10:40 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060214070751.HJBV17838.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:07:51 -0500 To: Greg KH In-Reply-To: <20060214065224.GA20541@kroah.com> (Greg KH's message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:52:24 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Greg KH writes: > Hm, git-send-email doesn't see this, so it doesn't get sent out if you > use that tool. And people are very likely to remove it by hand. Another possibility would be to use "git apply --numstat" and add numbers up in your script, but that would not give you a nice graph output either X-<. I'd say if you really care we should just remove those two lines, and remember I am _very_ receptive from such suggestion from prominent kernel people.