From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] git-daemon support for user-relative paths. Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:29:28 -0800 Message-ID: <7vhda5mvfr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20051117193714.428785C7FA@nox.op5.se> <7voe4ird8v.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <437DAA66.6070301@op5.se> <7voe4hfssj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <437E67AC.2010400@op5.se> <7vfypquz88.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <4381AB38.7090209@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 22 00:34:44 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EeL6L-0006mY-SL for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:29:34 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932460AbVKUX3a (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:29:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932477AbVKUX3a (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:29:30 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:34955 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932460AbVKUX3a (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:29:30 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051121232852.NYYG6244.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:28:52 -0500 To: Andreas Ericsson In-Reply-To: <4381AB38.7090209@op5.se> (Andreas Ericsson's message of "Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:10:48 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andreas Ericsson writes: > Apart from comments and indentation it's more or less exactly what I > have in my revised git-daemon patch (although without what you mentioned > in your own reply to this mail). > > Do you want the revised one from me or will you apply the original with > this on top? Well, let's push out what we have so far to "master" and then finish up whatever breakage if any in tree.