From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix fetch completeness assumptions Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:02:35 -0700 Message-ID: <7vhdckceas.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Sep 17 10:03:56 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGXej-00020p-5m for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:02:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751007AbVIQICi (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:02:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751005AbVIQICi (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:02:38 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:5604 "EHLO fed1rmmtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751006AbVIQICh (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:02:37 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20050917080237.BHPP29184.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:02:37 -0400 To: Daniel Barkalow In-Reply-To: (Daniel Barkalow's message of "Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:31:42 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Daniel Barkalow writes: > Don't assume that any commit we have is complete; assume that any ref > we have is complete. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow > > --- > Only lightly tested, but it seems to work. Marks all of the commits in > refs, and their ancestors back as far as the date of the commit it's > processing. If the commit it's processing is marked, it doesn't recurse > into it. Have you tested this idea with cloning into an empty repository? It seems to break my tests.