From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Cc: david@lang.hm, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:49:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7viqnabwb3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090216080432.GA16453@atjola.homenet> (Björn Steinbrink's message of "Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:04:32 +0100")
Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> writes:
> How about having the default in the code being a warning, but the
> default for new repos being "reject"?
To reserve time to manage git itself, I will try not to point people to
previous discussions, but I'd like help from people who've already seen
the previous discussions to do so. This is one of the things that was
proposed and already shot down.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-16 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-15 21:31 [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 21:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 22:56 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-15 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 23:20 ` Heikki Orsila
2009-02-16 0:04 ` disallowing push to currently checked-out branch Jeff King
2009-02-16 1:33 ` david
2009-02-16 1:47 ` david
2009-02-16 1:30 ` Julian Phillips
2009-02-16 4:01 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 8:33 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-02-16 8:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 10:17 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 13:58 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 17:13 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 17:33 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-02-16 17:43 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 18:48 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 20:02 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 21:12 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 21:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 22:28 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 22:52 ` Jeff King
2009-02-17 5:53 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 11:28 ` PUSH_HEAD, was " Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17 17:29 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 19:48 ` Jeff King
2009-02-17 22:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 22:42 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 22:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 19:24 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 20:09 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 21:42 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 0:07 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-17 0:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17 0:41 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-17 0:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17 1:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 0:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 21:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 22:43 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 23:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 0:23 ` Jeff King
2009-02-17 0:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 1:29 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 3:50 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 5:05 ` david
2009-02-16 4:05 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 5:18 ` david
2009-02-16 4:37 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 5:55 ` david
2009-02-16 5:06 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 10:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 10:50 ` dashed commands, was " Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:53 ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible david
2009-02-15 23:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 0:14 ` david
2009-02-15 23:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 0:38 ` david
2009-02-16 0:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 10:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 15:33 ` david
2009-02-16 14:40 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-02-16 0:02 ` disallowing push to currently checked-out branch Jeff King
2009-02-16 10:06 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-15 23:01 ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Jakub Narebski
2009-02-15 23:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:38 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-16 0:35 ` david
2009-02-16 0:07 ` send-email sending shallow threads by default Jeff King
2009-02-16 0:09 ` Pieter de Bie
2009-02-16 2:43 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 2:55 ` Brian Gernhardt
2009-02-16 9:56 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2009-02-16 7:55 ` SZEDER Gábor
2009-02-16 10:38 ` Martin Mares
2009-02-17 8:34 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-02-17 9:06 ` Martin Mares
2009-02-17 19:28 ` Jeff King
2009-02-20 3:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20 3:26 ` Jeff King
2009-02-20 4:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-17 8:30 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-02-16 1:27 ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Sitaram Chamarty
2009-02-16 8:04 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-02-16 8:49 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-02-16 9:07 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-02-16 2:42 ` [RFC - draft #2] " Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 3:20 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 21:10 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7viqnabwb3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).